Mullama, Ollama, and llama.cpp are the three most common ways to run a local LLM in 2026. They share an engine (llama.cpp underneath) but differ in how you talk to it. This comparison helps you pick the right one for your use case.
Overview
| Mullama | Ollama | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Rust | Go | C++ |
| Distribution | Daemon, library, or in-process | Daemon | Daemon or library |
| Native bindings | 6 languages (Rust, Python, Node, Go, PHP, C) | HTTP only | C/C++ only |
| Modelfile format | Ollama-compatible | Original | N/A |
| HTTP port | 11434 (Ollama-compatible) | 11434 | configurable |
| OpenAI-compatible API | ✓ | ✓ | partial |
| Anthropic-compatible API | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Built-in web UI | ✓ | ✗ (third-party only) | ✗ |
| Multimodal (vision + audio) | ✓ | partial | ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
When to use each
Choose Mullama when…
- You want to call LLM inference from your application code without running a separate server or making HTTP requests.
- You work in multiple languages and want one runtime that speaks them all natively (Rust, Python, Node.js, Go, PHP, C/C++).
- You want the same wire-compatible API as Ollama but with the option to embed inference in-process.
- You want a built-in web UI and TUI without bolting on Open WebUI or similar.
Choose Ollama when…
- You want the simplest possible setup: one command on the CLI, one Modelfile, one HTTP endpoint.
- You primarily use the OpenAI Python SDK, LangChain, or LlamaIndex and just need a local backend.
- You want a community ecosystem of GUIs (Open WebUI, LibreChat, AnythingLLM) that all assume Ollama’s port 11434.
- You do not need to embed inference in your own process.
Choose llama.cpp when…
- You want the lowest-level control over every kernel, quantization, and backend flag.
- You need the widest hardware support (CUDA, Metal, ROCm, Vulkan, OpenCL, SYCL, RPC, etc.) and want to tune it yourself.
- You are porting to a new platform or writing a custom hardware backend.
- You are comfortable building from source and managing your own CMake flags.
Code comparison
Same prompt, three ways
Mullama (Python, in-process):
from mullama import Model, Context
model = Model.load("llama3.2-1b.gguf", n_gpu_layers=32)
ctx = Context(model, n_ctx=4096)
print(ctx.generate("Explain GGUF in one paragraph."))
Ollama (HTTP):
# terminal
ollama run llama3.2:1b "Explain GGUF in one paragraph."
# python
import openai
client = openai.OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1", api_key="ollama")
print(client.chat.completions.create(
model="llama3.2:1b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain GGUF in one paragraph."}],
).choices[0].message.content)
llama.cpp (CLI):
./llama-cli -m llama3.2-1b.gguf -p "Explain GGUF in one paragraph." -n 256
Switching between them
If your application uses the OpenAI SDK, switching between Mullama, Ollama, and llama.cpp is a config change:
# Mullama or Ollama
client = openai.OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1", api_key="not-needed")
# llama.cpp server
client = openai.OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:8080/v1", api_key="not-needed")
Mullama has the advantage of also supporting the Anthropic SDK out of the box (/v1/messages).
Performance
For raw tokens/second on the same model and hardware:
- llama.cpp is the baseline (the others are wrappers around it).
- Mullama is within 1-3% of llama.cpp because the Rust layer is thin.
- Ollama adds 2-5% per-request overhead from the Go daemon, usually negligible for interactive use.
For batch / production serving with batching, the difference widens. Ollama’s batching is less aggressive than vLLM or TGI; llama.cpp’s server has minimal batching. Mullama inherits llama.cpp’s behavior but can be embedded to avoid the HTTP round-trip entirely.
Migration paths
Ollama → Mullama
Drop-in. Same CLI, same Modelfile, same port, same OpenAI-compatible API. Plus Anthropic-compatible API and in-process embedding.
Ollama → llama.cpp
Extract the GGUF model file. Replace ollama run with ./llama-cli -m model.gguf -p "..." for inference. Replace the HTTP daemon with ./llama-server -m model.gguf. Update your client code to point at the new port.
llama.cpp → Mullama
Replace your llama.cpp server invocation with mullama serve --model model.gguf. Same port, same wire format. Your existing OpenAI-compatible client code works unchanged.
Decision matrix
| Your situation | Use |
|---|---|
| Hobbyist, want the simplest setup | Ollama |
| Python app, need an OpenAI-compatible backend | Ollama or Mullama |
| Polyglot team (Rust + Python + Node + Go + PHP + C) | Mullama |
| Need to embed inference in-process, no daemon | Mullama |
| Need an Anthropic-compatible API | Mullama |
| Need to run on a 5-year-old GPU with custom kernels | llama.cpp |
| Need production batch serving at scale | vLLM or TGI, not these three |
| Need to port to a new platform | llama.cpp |
| Building a desktop app that needs LLM in-process | Mullama |
| Building a CLI tool that needs LLM in-process | Mullama |
| Educational / learning how inference works | llama.cpp + zigllm |
See also
- Mullama tool page — full feature list, install instructions, code samples
- Ollama tool page — full feature list, Modelfile syntax, model management
- llama.cpp tool page — full feature list, build instructions, backend matrix
- Best local LLM inference engines 2026 — broader comparison including vLLM, TGI, TensorRT-LLM, MLX