comparisonlocal-llmllama-4qwen-3deepseek-r1
Llama 4 vs Qwen 3 vs DeepSeek R1: Best Local LLM Family in 2026
Llama 4 vs Qwen 3 vs DeepSeek R1 — three open-weight model families head-to-head in 2026 on benchmarks, hardware fit, and best-use case. With a download-decision matrix.
Published June 29, 2026 · Updated June 29, 2026 · By Local LLM Team
Llama 4 vs Qwen 3 vs DeepSeek R1 in 2026
These are the three open-weight model families that dominate local LLM in 2026. Each has a different strength: Llama 4 is multimodal-first, Qwen 3 is the all-round best for most users, DeepSeek R1 is the reasoning leader. This page helps you pick which one to download.
Model lineup
| Model | Sizes | Quantized GGUF | Best for |
|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | 109B (17B active MoE) | ✓ | vision, long context (10M tokens) |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 400B (17B active MoE) | ✓ | vision, instruction following |
| Llama 4 Behemoth | 2T (not released for local) | ✗ | reference model only |
| Qwen 3 0.6B – 32B | dense | ✓ | general, chat, agentic |
| Qwen 3 30B-A3B | 30B (3B active MoE) | ✓ | chat, speed |
| Qwen 3 235B | 235B (22B active MoE) | ✓ | frontier-class, needs 128GB+ |
| Qwen 3-Coder 30B / 480B | 30B / 480B | ✓ | coding agents |
| DeepSeek R1 distilled | 1.5B – 70B | ✓ | reasoning on small hardware |
| DeepSeek R1 full | 671B (37B active) | ✓ | frontier-class reasoning |
Benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro)
| Model | MMLU | GSM8K | HumanEval | MMLU-Pro |
|---|
| Llama 4 Scout 17B | 76 | 88 | 78 | 64 |
| Qwen 3 32B | 81 | 92 | 82 | 70 |
| Qwen 3 30B-A3B | 79 | 90 | 80 | 67 |
| DeepSeek R1 distilled 32B | 78 | 95 | 80 | 68 |
| DeepSeek R1 671B (full) | 89 | 96 | 92 | 84 |
Llama 4’s MoE design trades raw accuracy for inference speed. Qwen 3 wins on the cost/quality curve for most users. DeepSeek R1 wins on reasoning.
Hardware fit
| Model | Min VRAM (Q4) | Recommended | Tokens/sec on 3090 |
|---|
| Llama 3.2 1B | 1 GB | 4 GB | 95 |
| Llama 3.2 3B | 3 GB | 6 GB | 65 |
| Qwen 2.5 3B | 3 GB | 6 GB | 68 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 5 GB | 8 GB | 42 |
| Qwen 2.5 7B | 5 GB | 8 GB | 48 |
| Mistral Nemo 12B | 8 GB | 12 GB | 28 |
| Qwen 3 14B | 9 GB | 12 GB | 30 |
| DeepSeek R1 distilled 14B | 9 GB | 12 GB | 32 |
| Qwen 3 32B | 20 GB | 24 GB | 16 |
| DeepSeek R1 distilled 32B | 20 GB | 24 GB | 17 |
| Llama 4 Scout 109B (offloaded) | 48 GB | 64 GB+ | 6 |
| DeepSeek R1 671B (offloaded) | 256 GB | 384 GB | 2 |
When to use each
Choose Llama 4 when…
- You need multimodal (image + text in the same conversation).
- You need long context (10M tokens with Scout, useful for big codebases or full books).
- You are an enterprise buyer who needs Meta’s license terms and compliance support.
Choose Qwen 3 when…
- You want the best all-round model for a single desktop GPU.
- You do coding, agentic workflows, or general chat — Qwen 3 30B is the strongest in its size class.
- You need multilingual (Chinese + English + 100+ languages).
- You want the largest model ecosystem with 0.6B through 235B sizes.
Choose DeepSeek R1 when…
- You do math, science, or step-by-step reasoning.
- You want to see the chain-of-thought and learn from it.
- You are on a single 24GB GPU and want the best reasoning — the 32B distilled R1 is excellent.
- You need “thinking” mode in your application — R1’s reasoning trace is a feature.
Quick start
# All three are available in Ollama with the same CLI
ollama run llama4:scout
ollama run qwen3:32b
ollama run deepseek-r1:32b
# Or with Mullama (drop-in Ollama)
mullama run llama4:scout
mullama run qwen3:32b
mullama run deepseek-r1:32b
Decision matrix
| Your hardware | Best fit |
|---|
| 8 GB VRAM | Llama 3.1 8B or Qwen 2.5 7B |
| 12 GB VRAM | Qwen 3 14B or DeepSeek R1 14B |
| 16 GB VRAM | Qwen 3 14B at Q8, or Mistral Nemo 12B |
| 24 GB VRAM (3090/4090) | Qwen 3 32B, DeepSeek R1 32B, or Llama 4 Scout 17B (MoE) |
| 48 GB VRAM (A6000, M3 Ultra) | Llama 4 Maverick offloaded, or Qwen 3 32B at FP16 |
| 128 GB+ (M3 Ultra, multi-GPU) | DeepSeek R1 671B |
| 16 GB Mac (M1/M2 Pro) | Qwen 2.5 7B or Llama 3.1 8B in MLX |
| 32 GB Mac (M2/M3/M4 Max) | Qwen 3 14B or Mistral Nemo 12B in MLX |
| 64+ GB Mac (M2/M3/M4 Ultra) | Qwen 3 32B in MLX |
See also
Frequently Asked Questions
Which model family is best in 2026 for local use?
For most users in 2026, Qwen 3 30B (or 32B) is the safest all-round pick: strong coding, strong reasoning, 24GB VRAM fits. For reasoning specifically, DeepSeek R1 distilled (14B or 32B) is hard to beat. Llama 4 is multimodal-first and better for vision tasks.
What about coding?
Qwen 2.5-Coder 32B (still the strongest 32B coder in 2026), or Qwen 3-Coder 30B. For smaller hardware, DeepSeek-Coder 6.7B or Qwen 2.5-Coder 7B punch above their weight.
What if I only have 8GB of VRAM?
Llama 3.2 3B (or Qwen 2.5 3B). Both run at 30+ tok/s on a 3090, both are reasonable for chat, neither is good for complex coding or reasoning.
Do I need to download a special tool to run any of these?
No. All three are available as GGUF files on Hugging Face and run with Ollama, Mullama, llama.cpp, or LM Studio. The tag you `ollama pull` resolves to the right repo automatically.