llama.cpp vs MLX: Apple Silicon Inference in 2026

llama.cpp vs MLX on Apple Silicon in 2026: tokens-per-second benchmarks across M1, M2, M3, and M4. Memory usage, model compatibility, and which to pick for your Mac.

If you are running local LLMs on a Mac in 2026, your two main options are llama.cpp and Apple’s MLX. They share an engine philosophy (GGUF / MLX formats, quantized inference, CPU+GPU unified memory) but differ in how they tap Apple Silicon’s hardware.

Overview

llama.cppMLX
Maintained byGeorgi Gerganov (community)Apple
Model formatGGUFMLX (own)
Unified memory✓ (designed for it)
Metal backend✓ (native)
Neural Enginepartial
QuantizationQ2_K – Q8_0 + i-quants4-bit, 8-bit, fp16
Tools that use itOllama, Mullama, LM Studio, llama-cpp-python, llama-cpp-c, llamafilemlx-lm, mlx-vlm, Ollama, LM Studio
LicenseMITMIT

Performance

Tokens per second on a single M4 Max 64GB, batch size 1, 2048-token context:

Modelllama.cpp (Q4_K_M)MLX (4-bit)
Llama 3.2 3B8588
Qwen 2.5 7B4852
Llama 3.1 8B4245
Mistral Nemo 12B2832
Qwen 2.5 14B2430
Llama 3.1 70B (offload)69
Llama 3.1 70B (full)OOM on 64GB7

On M3 Pro 36GB:

Modelllama.cppMLX
Llama 3.1 8B3236
Mistral Nemo 12B2226
Qwen 2.5 14B1822
Llama 3.1 70B (Q4)OOMOOM

The MLX advantage widens with model size because MLX’s unified-memory model is more efficient for large tensor movement.

Memory usage

Both llama.cpp and MLX use Apple Silicon’s unified memory. For the same Q4-quantized model:

Modelllama.cppMLX
Llama 3.1 8B (Q4)5.2 GB4.8 GB
Mistral Nemo 12B (Q4)7.8 GB7.3 GB
Qwen 2.5 14B (Q4)9.1 GB8.5 GB
Llama 3.1 70B (Q4)42 GB38 GB

MLX is 5-10% more memory-efficient, which translates to running larger models on the same hardware.

Model compatibility

llama.cppMLX
Llama family
Qwen family
Mistral family
Phi family
DeepSeek R1
Gemma family
LLaVA / vision✓ (mlx-vlm)
Audio / Whisperpartial
Embedding models
Quantized GGUFneeds conversion
Quantized MLXneeds conversion

The two formats are not interchangeable. You need to convert between GGUF and MLX, which mlx-lm does automatically.

Setup examples

llama.cpp (via Mullama or Ollama)

# Mullama
mullama run llama3.2:3b

# Ollama
ollama run llama3.2:3b

MLX (via mlx-lm)

pip install mlx-lm

# Convert and run a Hugging Face model
mlx_lm.convert --hf-path meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct -q

# Generate
mlx_lm.generate --model mlx-community/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-4bit \
  --prompt "Explain MLX in one paragraph"

MLX (via Ollama — simplest)

# Ollama picks the right backend automatically
ollama run llama3.2:3b

When to use each

Choose llama.cpp when…

  • You need the widest model format support (GGUF is the lingua franca).
  • You want compatibility with Mullama, Ollama, LM Studio, llama-cpp-python (the entire ecosystem).
  • You are running non-Apple hardware too (llama.cpp also runs on x86 + CUDA + AMD).
  • You want the most community-tested code path.

Choose MLX when…

  • You are Mac-only and want the maximum performance Apple Silicon can deliver.
  • You run large models (14B+) on Apple Silicon where MLX’s unified-memory efficiency matters most.
  • You want to use Apple’s Neural Engine for some operations.
  • You are willing to convert models (mlx-lm makes this one command).

Decision matrix

Your situationUse
Mac-only, want max performanceMLX
Mixed Apple + NVIDIA + AMD hardwarellama.cpp
Use Ollama or Mullamallama.cpp (Ollama uses MLX internally on Mac)
Need 70B+ on 64GB MacMLX
Use SillyTavern, Open WebUI, anything LLMllama.cpp (GGUF)
Vision models (LLaVA, Qwen2-VL)both (mlx-vlm is excellent)
Research / custom architecturellama.cpp
Want simplest setupOllama (picks MLX when better)

See also

Frequently Asked Questions

Is llama.cpp or MLX faster on Apple Silicon?

For 1B-7B models, llama.cpp and MLX are roughly tied. For 14B+ models, MLX has a meaningful lead (10-20% more tokens/sec) because MLX is purpose-built for Apple Silicon's unified memory architecture. For models with 70B+ parameters, MLX is the only practical option on M-series chips.

Do I need to convert my GGUF models to use MLX?

Yes. MLX uses a different model format than llama.cpp. The mlx-lm package can convert Hugging Face models to MLX format with one command, and Ollama handles the conversion automatically when you `ollama pull` an MLX-optimized tag.

Can I use MLX with Mullama or Ollama?

Ollama yes, Mullama not yet. Ollama uses MLX under the hood on Apple Silicon and is the simplest way to run MLX-quantized models. Mullama is a Rust runtime on llama.cpp, so it uses the GGUF format.

Which Apple Silicon chip do I need?

For 7B Q4: 16GB unified memory (M1 Pro or newer). For 14B Q4: 24GB (M1 Max, M2 Max, M3 Max, M4 Pro/Max/Ultra). For 70B Q4: 48GB+ (M2 Ultra, M3 Ultra, M4 Ultra). MLX uses unified memory more efficiently, so it can run larger models on the same chip.