MLC LLM vs Llamafu: On-Device LLM on Mobile in 2026

MLC LLM vs Llamafu compared: two ways to run LLMs on iOS and Android in 2026. Compared on install steps, supported models, performance, and integration.

MLC LLM vs Llamafu: on-device LLM on mobile in 2026

If you want to ship an LLM inside a mobile app in 2026, these are the two main options. MLC LLM is the academic / research-backed option with broad platform support. Llamafu is the Flutter / FFI option focused on the cognisoc family.

Overview

MLC LLMLlamafu
OwnerCMU + communitycognisoc (Srushta Media)
First release20232025
Primary bindingSwift (iOS), Java/Kotlin (Android), JavaScript (Web)Dart (Flutter), Android, iOS
Model formatMLC (own, compiled)GGUF (universal)
BackendMetal, OpenCL, Vulkan, WebGPUllama.cpp (Metal, OpenCL, Vulkan)
Model coveragecurated set, needs compilationany GGUF model
Apple Neural Enginepartial (experimental)partial
Vision / multimodal✓ (mlc-vlm)✓ (LLaVA, Qwen2-VL)
Function calling
Structured JSON✓ (GBNF)
LoRA hot-swap
Flutter / Dartvia FFIfirst-class
Web✓ (WebGPU)
LicenseApache 2.0MIT

When to use each

Choose MLC LLM when…

  • You are building a native iOS app in Swift, or a native Android app in Kotlin / Java.
  • You need WebGPU support (for web-based apps that run LLMs in the browser).
  • You want the broadest platform coverage including less-common targets (Raspberry Pi, smart TVs, embedded).
  • You are okay with the model compilation step (each model needs to be pre-compiled to MLC format).

Choose Llamafu when…

  • You are building a Flutter app (Llamafu is a first-class Flutter FFI plugin).
  • You want to use any GGUF model without a pre-compilation step.
  • You need LoRA hot-swap (load a new personality on the fly).
  • You want the simpler integration (single dependency, no model compilation).
  • You are already in the cognisoc ecosystem (mullama, llamafu, etc.).

Performance

Tokens per second on flagship phones, Llama 3.2 1B Q4:

DeviceMLC LLMLlamafu
iPhone 15 Pro2218
iPhone 141614
Pixel 8 Pro1412
Galaxy S24 Ultra1211
OnePlus 121110

On the same hardware, the two are within ~15% of each other. MLC has a slight lead on Apple Silicon because of its Metal-specific optimizations. Llamafu is more consistent across Android devices because llama.cpp has more hardware coverage.

Setup

MLC LLM (iOS, Swift)

// Package.swift
dependencies: [
    .package(url: "https://github.com/mlc-ai/mlc-swift", branch: "main"),
]

// Use
let engine = MLCEngine()
try await engine.reload(modelPath: "Llama-3.2-1B-q4f16_1-MLC")
let response = try await engine.chat(
    messages: [ChatMessage(role: .user, content: "Hello")]
)

MLC LLM (Android, Kotlin)

// build.gradle
implementation("ai.mlc:mlc-chat-android:0.2.0")

// Use
val engine = MLCEngine()
engine.reload(modelPath = "Llama-3.2-1B-q4f16_1-MLC")
val response = engine.chat("Hello")

Llamafu (Flutter)

import 'package:llamafu/llamafu.dart';

final llamafu = await Llamafu.init(
  modelPath: '/path/to/llama-3.2-1b-q4_k_m.gguf',
  threads: 4,
  contextSize: 2048,
  nGpuLayers: 99,  // offload all
);

final result = await llamafu.complete(
  prompt: 'Hello, AI!',
  maxTokens: 256,
);

Llamafu (Android, Java/Kotlin)

implementation("com.cognisoc:llamafu-android:0.1.0")

Llamafu (iOS, Swift)

.package(url: "https://github.com/cognisoc/llamafu", branch: "main")

Model preparation

MLC LLMLlamafu
Pre-compiled modelsmlc-ai/models on HFnone (any GGUF)
Compile from HFmlc_llm.convert (CLI)none
Compile time5-30 min per model0
Custom fine-tunesneeds recompiledrop in GGUF

If you are using a fine-tuned model or a new release the same day it ships, Llamafu is the clear winner — no compilation step.

Decision matrix

Your situationUse
Flutter appLlamafu
Native Swift iOS appMLC LLM (slight perf edge)
Native Kotlin Android appeither, Llamafu is simpler
Web app (WebGPU)MLC LLM
Need LoRA hot-swapLlamafu
Using a custom fine-tuned modelLlamafu (no compile)
Using an off-the-shelf modelMLC LLM (slight perf edge)
Need the broadest model coverageLlamafu (any GGUF)
Embedded / smart TV / PiMLC LLM
Apple Neural EngineMLC LLM (experimental)
Want production-grade stabilityLlamafu (uses llama.cpp, battle-tested)

See also

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for on-device LLM on mobile in 2026?

For Flutter apps, Llamafu. For native iOS apps, MLC LLM has a slight edge on Apple Silicon. For native Android apps, both work but Llamafu is easier to integrate. For web apps, MLC LLM's WebGPU is the only choice.

What models can I run on a phone?

Both support any GGUF model (Llamafu) or any MLC-compiled model (MLC LLM). For phones, stick to 1B-3B models at Q4_K_M. Phi-3 mini, Llama 3.2 1B/3B, Qwen 2.5 0.5B/1.5B/3B are all good choices.

Does inference happen entirely on-device?

Yes. Both run the model on the device's CPU/GPU/NPU. No data leaves the phone. No API calls. Works offline.

How fast is it?

On iPhone 15 Pro: 15-25 tok/s for Llama 3.2 1B Q4. On Pixel 8 Pro: 10-18 tok/s for the same model. Enough for chat UI but not for real-time voice.