comparisonlocal-llmfine-tuningunslothaxolotlllama-factory
Unsloth vs Axolotl vs LLaMA-Factory: Fine-Tuning Frameworks in 2026
Unsloth vs Axolotl vs LLaMA-Factory compared: three frameworks for fine-tuning LLMs locally in 2026, with VRAM, speed, and feature tables.
Published June 29, 2026 · Updated June 29, 2026 · By Local LLM Team
Unsloth vs Axolotl vs LLaMA-Factory in 2026
These three frameworks cover the bulk of local LLM fine-tuning in 2026. They differ in speed, VRAM efficiency, flexibility, and feature set. This page helps you pick.
Overview
| Unsloth | Axolotl | LLaMA-Factory |
|---|
| First release | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 |
| Language | Python (CUDA kernels) | Python (PyTorch + DeepSpeed) | Python (PyTorch + Transformers) |
| Primary use | single-GPU QLoRA | multi-GPU production | web UI + broad features |
| Training methods | LoRA, QLoRA, full FT | LoRA, QLoRA, full FT, DPO, RLHF | LoRA, QLoRA, full FT, DPO, PPO, KTO, ORPO, + |
| VRAM savings (claimed) | 40% vs baseline | varies | varies |
| Speedup (claimed) | 2-5× | 1-1.5× | 1-1.2× |
| YAML config | ✗ (Python) | ✓ (extensive) | ✓ (extensive) |
| Web UI | ✗ (notebooks) | ✗ | ✓ (LLaMA Board) |
| Multi-GPU | partial | ✓ (DeepSpeed, FSDP) | ✓ (DeepSpeed, FSDP) |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
VRAM and speed (7B model, QLoRA, batch 1, 1024 ctx, RTX 4090)
| Framework | VRAM used | Tokens/sec |
|---|
| Baseline (HF + PEFT) | 18 GB | 1,200 |
| Unsloth | 11 GB | 3,400 |
| Axolotl | 16 GB | 1,500 |
| LLaMA-Factory | 17 GB | 1,400 |
Unsloth has a clear lead on single-GPU. The gap closes on multi-GPU setups where DeepSpeed and FSDP matter more.
When to use each
Choose Unsloth when…
- You are fine-tuning on a single GPU (24GB or less).
- You want the fastest training and the lowest VRAM.
- You are doing LoRA or QLoRA (not full fine-tuning).
- You are okay with a Python notebook-style API rather than YAML.
Choose Axolotl when…
- You need the most flexible YAML config for complex training setups.
- You are doing multi-GPU training with DeepSpeed or FSDP.
- You want every training method (DPO, RLHF, ORPO, KTO, etc.) supported.
- You are training a research model where the config is the artifact.
Choose LLaMA-Factory when…
- You want a web UI to manage experiments.
- You want the broadest feature set including the latest alignment methods.
- You are doing continued pre-training as well as fine-tuning.
- You want a single tool for training, evaluation, and export.
Code comparison
Unsloth (Python notebook)
from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
from trl import SFTTrainer
model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(
"unsloth/llama-3.1-8b-bnb-4bit",
max_seq_length=2048,
load_in_4bit=True,
)
model = FastLanguageModel.get_peft_model(
model, r=16, target_modules=["q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj"],
)
trainer = SFTTrainer(model=model, train_dataset=dataset, ...)
trainer.train()
Axolotl (YAML)
# axolotl config
base_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
model_type: LlamaForCausalLM
load_in_4bit: true
adapter: qlora
lora_r: 16
lora_target_modules:
- q_proj
- k_proj
- v_proj
- o_proj
datasets:
- path: my_dataset.jsonl
type: alpaca
accelerate launch -m axolotl.cli.train config.yml
LLaMA-Factory (YAML or Web UI)
# Web UI
llamafactory-cli webui
# CLI
llamafactory-cli train \
--model_name_or_path meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \
--quantization_bit 4 \
--lora_rank 16 \
--dataset my_dataset \
--output_dir ./output
Decision matrix
| Your situation | Use |
|---|
| Single GPU, 12-24GB VRAM | Unsloth |
| Single GPU, want max speed | Unsloth |
| Multi-GPU, DeepSpeed / FSDP | Axolotl |
| Research, complex YAML | Axolotl |
| Want web UI | LLaMA-Factory |
| DPO, ORPO, KTO, RLHF | LLaMA-Factory (broadest) |
| Continued pre-training | LLaMA-Factory |
| Just need to fine-tune a 7B fast | Unsloth |
| Production-grade training | Axolotl or LLaMA-Factory |
| On Apple Silicon | LLaMA-Factory (best MPS support) |
See also